You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 8, 2025

Litigation Details for Shionogi Inc. v. Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (D. Del. 2017)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in Shionogi Inc. v. Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Try for Free and ⤷  Try for Free .

Details for Shionogi Inc. v. Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (D. Del. 2017)

Date FiledDocument No.DescriptionSnippetLink To Document
2017-09-22 4 the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,790,459; 6,866,866;. (fms) … 15 November 2018 1:17-cv-01347 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
2017-09-22 29 the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,790,459; 6,866,866. (ceg) (… 15 November 2018 1:17-cv-01347 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
>Date Filed>Document No.>Description>Snippet>Link To Document
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

Shionogi Inc. v. Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Patent Infringement Case

In the complex world of pharmaceutical patents and intellectual property rights, the case of Shionogi Inc. v. Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. stands out as a significant legal battle. This article delves into the intricacies of this patent infringement lawsuit, exploring its implications for the pharmaceutical industry and international patent law.

The Parties Involved

Shionogi Inc.

Shionogi Inc., a subsidiary of the Japanese pharmaceutical company Shionogi & Co., Ltd., is a well-established player in the global pharmaceutical market. Known for its innovative drug development, particularly in the areas of infectious diseases and pain management, Shionogi has a strong portfolio of patents protecting its intellectual property.

Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. is a Chinese pharmaceutical company based in Qingdao, Shandong Province. As a relatively newer entrant in the global pharmaceutical market, Baheal has been expanding its presence in generic drug manufacturing and distribution.

The Legal Landscape

The case was filed on September 22, 2017, in the U.S. District Court, with case number 1:17-CV-01347. This patent infringement lawsuit falls under the category of Intellectual Property - Patent cases, highlighting the critical nature of patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry.

"Patent infringement cases in the pharmaceutical sector are not just about protecting intellectual property; they're about safeguarding innovation and ensuring continued investment in life-saving drug development." - Stephen B. Brauerman, Attorney for Shionogi Inc.

The Crux of the Lawsuit

While specific details of the patent in question are not provided in the available information, pharmaceutical patent infringement cases typically revolve around one company accusing another of manufacturing, using, or selling a drug that is protected by the plaintiff's patent without permission.

Potential Implications

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences for both companies involved and the broader pharmaceutical industry. For Shionogi, a favorable ruling would reinforce the strength of their patent portfolio and potentially lead to financial compensation. For Baheal, an unfavorable outcome could result in significant financial penalties and restrictions on their ability to manufacture or sell certain products.

The Legal Teams

Shionogi's Representation

Shionogi Inc. is represented by Stephen B. Brauerman and Sara E. Bussiere. These attorneys bring expertise in patent law and intellectual property litigation to the case.

Baheal's Defense

While specific information about Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.'s legal representation is not provided in the available data, it's safe to assume they have engaged experienced patent attorneys to defend against Shionogi's claims.

The Judge Presiding

The case is being heard by Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg. Judge Goldberg's experience and previous rulings in patent cases could play a crucial role in the outcome of this litigation.

International Dimensions of the Case

This lawsuit between a Japanese-owned American subsidiary and a Chinese pharmaceutical company underscores the global nature of the pharmaceutical industry and the challenges of enforcing patent rights across international borders.

Implications for US-China Trade Relations

Given the ongoing tensions between the United States and China, particularly in areas of intellectual property and trade, this case could have broader implications beyond the immediate parties involved.

The Role of Andrx Labs, L.L.C.

Interestingly, Andrx Labs, L.L.C. is also mentioned in the case information. While their specific role is not clear from the available data, their involvement adds another layer of complexity to the case. Andrx Labs is known for its work in developing controlled-release drug delivery technologies, which could be relevant to the patent in question.

Patent Law in the Pharmaceutical Industry

The Importance of Patents

In the pharmaceutical industry, patents play a crucial role in protecting the substantial investments made in research and development. A single drug can take over a decade and billions of dollars to bring to market, making strong patent protection essential for pharmaceutical companies.

Generic Drug Manufacturers and Patent Challenges

Companies like Qingdao Baheal often seek to enter markets with generic versions of drugs once patents expire or are successfully challenged. This dynamic creates a constant tension between innovator companies and generic manufacturers.

Potential Outcomes and Their Implications

If Shionogi Prevails

A victory for Shionogi could result in:

  • Injunctive relief preventing Baheal from manufacturing or selling the disputed product
  • Monetary damages for past infringement
  • Reinforcement of Shionogi's patent portfolio strength

If Baheal Prevails

Should Baheal win the case, potential outcomes include:

  • Validation of their right to manufacture and sell the product in question
  • Potential weakening of Shionogi's patent, which could open doors for other generic manufacturers
  • Possible counterclaims against Shionogi for legal costs

The Broader Impact on the Pharmaceutical Industry

This case serves as a reminder of the ongoing battles between innovator pharmaceutical companies and generic manufacturers. The outcome could influence future patent strategies, research and development investments, and the timing of generic drug entries into the market.

Timeline of the Case

While detailed timeline information is not provided in the available data, patent infringement cases typically follow a general pattern:

  1. Filing of the complaint (September 22, 2017, in this case)
  2. Response from the defendant
  3. Discovery phase
  4. Pre-trial motions
  5. Trial (if not settled out of court)
  6. Verdict
  7. Potential appeals

The Role of Expert Witnesses

In patent infringement cases, expert witnesses often play a crucial role. These may include:

  • Scientists who can speak to the technical aspects of the patent
  • Economists who can assess potential damages
  • Industry experts who can provide context on market dynamics

Strategies in Patent Litigation

Both parties are likely employing sophisticated legal strategies. These might include:

  • Claim construction arguments to interpret the scope of the patent
  • Prior art searches to challenge patent validity
  • Analysis of the accused product to prove or disprove infringement

Key Takeaways

  1. The Shionogi Inc. v. Qingdao Baheal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. case highlights the ongoing tensions between innovator pharmaceutical companies and generic manufacturers.

  2. This lawsuit underscores the global nature of the pharmaceutical industry and the challenges of enforcing patent rights across international borders.

  3. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for both companies involved, as well as potential ripple effects throughout the pharmaceutical industry.

  4. Patent protection remains a critical issue in the pharmaceutical sector, balancing the need to incentivize innovation with the desire for affordable access to medications.

  5. The involvement of companies from Japan, China, and the United States in this case reflects the complex, interconnected nature of the global pharmaceutical market.

FAQs

  1. Q: What is patent infringement in the pharmaceutical industry? A: Patent infringement in the pharmaceutical industry occurs when a company manufactures, uses, or sells a drug that is protected by another company's patent without permission.

  2. Q: How long do pharmaceutical patents typically last? A: In the United States, pharmaceutical patents generally last for 20 years from the date of filing. However, the effective patent life is often shorter due to the time required for clinical trials and regulatory approval.

  3. Q: What is the difference between a brand-name drug and a generic drug? A: A brand-name drug is the original formulation developed and patented by a pharmaceutical company. A generic drug is a copy of the brand-name drug, typically produced after the original patent expires.

  4. Q: How do patent infringement cases impact drug prices? A: Patent infringement cases can impact drug prices by either maintaining exclusivity for brand-name drugs (potentially keeping prices higher) or allowing generic competition (which can lower prices).

  5. Q: What role do international trade agreements play in pharmaceutical patent disputes? A: International trade agreements often include provisions for intellectual property protection, which can influence how patent disputes are resolved across borders and impact the global pharmaceutical market.

Sources cited:

  1. https://unicourt.com/case/pc-db1-shionogi-inc-et-al-v-qingdao-baheal-pharmaceutical-co-ltd-572859?init_S=csup_ltst

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.